← Back to all posts
Liability is the single biggest concern for landowners considering hunting leases. What happens if a hunter is injured on your property? Most US states have statutory protections that significantly reduce landowner exposure — but the protections only attach if you set things up correctly. Here's the lay of the land.
Nearly every state has a Recreational Use Statute that limits a landowner's duty of care to people on the property for recreational purposes, including hunting. The typical structure: as long as the landowner doesn't act with gross negligence or willfully injure someone, they aren't liable for ordinary accidents. Most statutes require that no admission fee be charged (or cap fees at certain thresholds), and many require posted signs or written notice.
Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 75 provides the baseline Recreational Use protection — a landowner owes no greater duty of care than they would to a trespasser, provided they don't act with gross negligence or malicious intent and they meet specific conditions tied to the relationship between admission fees charged and property tax valuation.
Texas also has the Agritourism Act (Chapter 75A), enacted in 2015, which provides enhanced protection for landowners hosting agritourism activities including hunting. The Agritourism Act requires very specific waiver language signed by the participant — the statute literally specifies the warning text that must appear on the waiver. Get the magic words right and the statute attaches; get them wrong and the immunity doesn't apply.
Oklahoma Statute Title 76 §10-15 provides recreational use protection similar to Texas Chapter 75 — landowners are not liable for injuries to recreational users under normal circumstances. Oklahoma's statute is more straightforward than Texas's, with fewer fee-based conditions.
Arkansas Code Annotated §18-11-301 et seq. provides recreational use immunity. The statute limits the duty of care landowners owe to people who enter the property for recreational purposes without charge, with some carve-outs for substantial commercial operations.
Georgia Code §51-3-20 to 51-3-26 (the Recreational Property Act) provides strong landowner immunity for non-paying recreational users. Georgia courts have generally interpreted this protection broadly, making it one of the more landowner-friendly statutes in the Southeast.
Alabama Code §35-15-1 to §35-15-28 provides recreational use protection. Alabama's statute is unusual in that it has specific posted-sign requirements — landowners who want full statutory protection should post conspicuous signs at all customary access points to the property.
All four states have substantially similar Recreational Use Statutes (Mississippi Code §89-2-1, Louisiana Revised Statutes §9:2791, Tennessee Code §70-7-101, Kentucky Revised Statutes §411.190). All limit landowner liability when property is opened for hunting or other recreational use without a meaningful admission fee, subject to the gross-negligence carve-out.
Statutory protection is real but it's not bulletproof. Smart landowners layer protections: maintain umbrella liability insurance that explicitly covers hunting lease activity, use written lease agreements with clear liability waivers and indemnification clauses, require hunters to sign an assumption-of-risk waiver before access, keep the property reasonably safe and document any known hazards, and consult an attorney licensed in your state — especially for multi-year leases or commercial outfitter operations.
Browse hunting leases with Stripe escrow protection. Free to search.